Categories: Insights


11 Aug 2011

LAW BY DECREE No. 98/2011: NO BENEFIT FOR APPRENTICES AND EXECUTIVES IN CASE OF COMPANY CRISIS

Article 18, paragraph 2, Law By Decree No. 98/2011, repealed paragraph 10-bis of Article 19, Law By Decree No. 185/2008 which provided for the extension of the mobility allowance also to the employees not entitled to the ordinary treatments ex Article 7, Law No. 223/1991. Therefore, the mobility so called “in deroga” was suppressed for apprentices, executives, supplied workers, on-call workers, fixed-term employees, seasonal or occasional workers and employees dismissed by professional firms, as well as the application of the law concerning the ordinary unemployment benefit with regards to the social security contribution called “figurativa” only (eight months for employees under 50 years old and twelve months for employees aged equal or above 50 years). This abolition has been provided in spite of the previous extension of the measures under exam for the years 2010 and 2011.
However, it has been decreed that the Minister of Labour, in concert with the Minister of Economy, could grant an additional indemnity – within the limits of the Social Fund for Employment and Training and for a number of monthly payments equal to the duration of the unemployment benefit – to the employees not entitled to the mobility allowance, in case of dismissal or working relationship termination and if the such employees receive the ordinary unemployment benefit with normal requirements.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…