Categories: Insights


11 Aug 2011

LAW BY DECREE No. 98/2011: NO BENEFIT FOR APPRENTICES AND EXECUTIVES IN CASE OF COMPANY CRISIS

Article 18, paragraph 2, Law By Decree No. 98/2011, repealed paragraph 10-bis of Article 19, Law By Decree No. 185/2008 which provided for the extension of the mobility allowance also to the employees not entitled to the ordinary treatments ex Article 7, Law No. 223/1991. Therefore, the mobility so called “in deroga” was suppressed for apprentices, executives, supplied workers, on-call workers, fixed-term employees, seasonal or occasional workers and employees dismissed by professional firms, as well as the application of the law concerning the ordinary unemployment benefit with regards to the social security contribution called “figurativa” only (eight months for employees under 50 years old and twelve months for employees aged equal or above 50 years). This abolition has been provided in spite of the previous extension of the measures under exam for the years 2010 and 2011.
However, it has been decreed that the Minister of Labour, in concert with the Minister of Economy, could grant an additional indemnity – within the limits of the Social Fund for Employment and Training and for a number of monthly payments equal to the duration of the unemployment benefit – to the employees not entitled to the mobility allowance, in case of dismissal or working relationship termination and if the such employees receive the ordinary unemployment benefit with normal requirements.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…