Categories: Insights


25 Oct 2012

MINISTRY OF LABOUR: THE SUPPLY WORK HAS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE 36 MONTHS LIMIT PROVIDED FOR THE FIXED-TERM EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT (Il Sole 24 Ore, October 20, 2012, page 26)

The Ministry of Labour, with response to questioning No. 32/2012, has clarified that the periods of supply work have not to be considered in the maximum duration, equal to 36 months, provided for the fixed-term employment contract after the exceeding of the maximum duration itself. The Ministry suggests to apply the Law No. 92/2012 with a very particular interpretation: the periods of supply work have to be included in the “counter”, as provided for by the new legislation, but only until the achievement of the above-mentioned 36 months. Once the maximum duration has been attained, according to the Ministry, the employer cannot sign fixed-term employment contract anymore, but can continue to use the employee with fixed-term supply work contract.

 


 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

22 Oct 2026

Access to NASpI in light of recent case law (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 22 October 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), established by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the main income support measure for employees who have involuntarily…

19 Oct 2026

From Innovation to Governance: The Impact of the AI Act on HR Processes, between Compliance, Transparency and Accountability (AIDP – HR Online, 19 October 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Martina De Angela)

In recent years, artificial intelligence has evolved from an experimental technology into a tool that is increasingly integrated into the day-to-day activities of HR functions. Among other things,…

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…