Categories: Insights, Practice

Tag: Apprendistato, Diritto di Precedenza, Tempo determinato


25 Sep 2017

Apprenticeship and right to take precedence: the clarifications of the Ministry

With its Ruling no. 2 of 9 August 2017, the Ministry for Labour and Social Policies has replied to the question posed by Confcommercio on the correct interpretation of the right to take precedence of workers hired under a temporary contract. In particular, the requesting organization asked whether the following constitutes infringement of the right to take precedence of a temporary worker: (i) continuation of the employment relationship in place with the apprentice upon expiry of the related apprenticeship period; (ii) hiring of a new worker under an apprenticeship contract. In response to the first question, the Ministry has clarified that since apprenticeship is a permanent employment contract, violation of the right to take precedence shall be ruled out given that, for the purpose of the exercise of this right, the time of hiring of the apprentice is relevant, which occurs in fact the moment the apprenticeship contract starts and not during the normal continuation of the work relationship at the end of the training period. In response to the second question, the Ministry has specified that the hiring of a new worker under an apprenticeship contract constitutes violation of the right to take precedence of a temporary worker only if said temporary worker has already obtained the professional qualifications required for the job forming the scope of the apprenticeship contract, due to previous temporary employment contracts. This latter instance suggests that the professional experience of a temporary worker should be carefully considered in order to avert the risk of infringing the legislation on right to take precedence. 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…