Categories: Insights, Practice

Tag: Ispettorato Nazionale del Lavoro


28 Aug 2018

Failure to hire disabled people or individuals falling under protected categories is an immediate breach of the law with permanent effects

The National Labour Inspectorate (INL), with  its Note No. 6316 dated 18 July 2018 provided its opinion regarding the legal nature of the offence related to failure to hire disabled individuals or individuals belonging to the protected categories as per art. 15, paragraph 4, of the law No. 68/1999. According to INL the aforementioned offence shall be deemed immediate and with permanent effects. Immediate due to the fact that the omission occurs when the term established by law expires and the party bearing the legal responsibility to perform the hiring by the 60th day from the date in which the obligation occurs fails to do so. Permanent due to the extended effect of the offence over time until the breach is corrected. Qualifying an offence as immediate triggers a number of repercussions in terms of applicable regulation, in the case of sequence of laws over time. Regarding the offences occurred when the old regulation was in force – whose effects continue to apply even after the new penalty provision established by article 5, paragraph 1, letter b) of Law Decree No. 185/2016entered into force on 8 October 2016 – the applicable penalty will be the one in force at the time in which the offence occurred, according to the “tempus regit actum” principle. Even with reference to the terms of the statute of limitations it will be necessary to refer to the time when the offence actually occurred.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…