Categories: Insights, Practice

Tag: distaccatario, distacco transnazionale, Ispettorato Nazionale del Lavoro, prestazione di servizi, unità produttiva


27 Jun 2017

Legitimacy indexes of transnational posting according to the inspectors

With note No. 4833 dated 5 June 2017, the Italian Labour Inspectorate provided clarifications regarding the correct application of the Legislative Decree No. 136/2016 on the topic of transnational posting. With reference to the concept of “provision of services” the provision clarifies that such wide meaning term – which assumes the execution of temporary work activities in favour of a beneficiary located in Italy (that is the “receiving entity”) or a production unit of the foreign posting company present in Italy or at a client party – include tenders, sub-tenders and, more in general, any trade agreement having as its scope the exchange of services between companies located in different countries. Regarding the concept of the production unit of the foreign company posting in Italy, the Inspectorate specified that it must be a unit having a minimum level of organization of means and/or people and that, therefore, be an actual centre for handling relationships and legal situations related to the foreign entity. According to the Inspectorate, within the legitimate transnational posting cases fall those in which foreign workers are sent to Italy to work at a branch of the posting foreign entity or at another commercial entity (e.g. the “receiving entity”) located in Italy and that, subsequently, are engaged in Italy to carry out a tender at another client company. Lastly, the Inspectorate, on the one hand, excluded from the term “provision of transnational services” the activities carried out at temporary stalls on occasion of expos, fairs and events since a stall cannot be deemed a production unit, while on the other hand it included in the definition the activities to assemble and disassemble the stalls.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…