Categories: Insights, Practice


28 Mar 2016

On line resignation: the first critical aspects

On 12 March 2016, the new procedure came into force governing online resignation and termination by agreement, introduced by the Jobs Act. However, there are certain critical aspects of the new procedure. Firstly, there is an initial doubt regarding the procedure’s application in the case of resignation during an employee’s trial period. On the one hand, the Labour Ministry, in its circular 12/2016 of 4 March, expressly excluded its application in such cases; on the other hand, in listing those cases in which the procedure shall not apply, the law did not include resignation during employees’ trial period. The aforesaid circular also reconfirmed that the period of notice to be given by a resigning employee shall run from the date of activation of the electronic procedure. Consequently, if the employee does not have an Italian National Social Security (INPS) Personal Identification Number (PIN), then said employee shall have to wait until being issued with such PIN, and thus the period during which he/she may leave the company shall be extended accordingly. The law has also granted the employee the right to withdraw his/her resignation within seven days; therefore, if the employer has promptly replaced the employee, the employer will run the risk of finding itself with two employees in the same position. No information has been forthcoming, even from the Ministry, regarding the possible non-activation of the procedure on the part of the employee. In such event, the latter should remain in the employ of the employer, who should thus be forced to bring disciplinary proceedings, and at the end of such, penalize the employee’s conduct with his/her dismissal.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…