Categories: Insights, Practice


29 May 2017

The new rules governing merit-based indemnity

Effective 1 April 2017, the new method for the calculation of the merit-based indemnity for sales agents established by article 11 of the Collective bargaining agreement for the industrial sector (Aec Industria) signed by the social partners on 30 July 2014. The new rules, which follow closely the method adopted by the German Commercial Code, introduce a rather complex system based on the calculation of the “difference between the initial commissions and the final ones“. Essentially, a comparison is made between the volume of commission income and any other remuneration received by the agent on the first and the last portion of the relationship. In addition, two new criteria have been introduced to define the calculation: (i) the “assessment period” (periodo di prognosi) subsequent to the termination of the relationship, that is the expected years for which the contracting company will benefit from the work of the agent and (ii) the expected “migration rate” of clients, that is the percentage of annual turnover reduction and/or loss of clients regardless of the activities of the agent. If the merit-based indemnity so calculated exceeds the amount established by art. 1751 of the Civil Code, it shall be equal to that amount. If, instead, it is lower than the statutory amount, only the portion exceeding the value of the Firr (Retirement Bonus Provision) and the provision for supplementary customer allowances (indennità suppletiva di clientela) shall be paid. As anticipated, this calculation system applies only effective from 1 April 2017: this means that for agency agreements already in place at the time of entry into force of the Aec, in order to calculate the merit-based indemnity it will be necessary to apply two different calculations, using respectively the old and the new calculation criteria.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…