Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: Covid-19, Remote working, smart working


25 Oct 2021

Remote working and returning to work: post-emergency considerations (Il Quotidiano del lavoro of Il Sole 24 Ore, 25 October 2021 – Vittorio De Luca)

Remote working has exponentially increased due to the Covid-19 health emergency that started in 2020.

The advantages and potential of this work method, forcibly experienced at a mass level during the pandemic, oriented many companies towards a new “hybrid” organisation that combines in-person and remote work.

Many companies have applied a more flexible organisation that allows workers to choose when to work in-person or remotely, making their space and time boundaries more fluid.

Considering the complex emergent regulatory framework, proper remote working conduct in the post-pandemic era becomes crucial. It needs to be understood that “remote” working does not mean working “from home.” Remote working, as defined by Chapter II of Law no. 81/2017 is a specific and flexible way of organising employment, independent of the workplace and time, and established by agreement between the parties. Under Art. 18, paragraph 1 of the above law, the employee works partly inside the company’s premises and partly outside, without a fixed location.

Remote working requires a fixed term or open-ended agreement between the employer and employee to regulate essential aspects, such as: (i) the forms of exercise of the employer’s executive and control powers; (ii) the worker’s rest time and the technical and organisational measures necessary to ensure the worker’s right to disconnection from the technological work tools; (iii) any conduct that may be sanctioned at a disciplinary level and, (iv) any right to lifelong learning.

Last year’s emergency legislation has led to a partial derogation from the ordinary rules by introducing a “simplified” method to access remote working. Under this method, remote working can be implemented without an individual worker agreement by sending an electronic communication to the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy with the workers’ names and remote working termination date.

The regulations include obligations to provide information on occupational health and safety risks under art. 22 of Law no. 81/2017 which may be fulfilled electronically. Currently, private employers can use simplified remote working until 31 December 2021 under Law no. 87/2021 converting into law Decree-Law no. 52/2021 ( Reopening Decree).

Please note that the “emergency” remote working regulations have led to a derogation – which is close to expiry. This derogation applies to the agreement between the parties, and does mean losing the need to regulate and guarantee a series of aspects that are naturally governed in the agreement. Specifically these include “work performance”, “forms of exercise of the employer’s  executive power, “tools used by the worker”; “worker’s rest time”; “technical and organisational measures necessary to ensure the worker’s disconnection from the work technological tools”; “right to lifelong learning”; “exercise of the employer’s control power”; “conduct connected with the work performance…, which give rise to the application of disciplinary sanctions” (art. 18, 19, 20 and 21 L no. 81/2017).

Continue reading the full version published on Il Quotidiano del Lavoro of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…