Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: mobbing


24 Jun 2021

Employee transfer is not mobbing (Il Quotidiano del lavoro de Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 juin 2021 – Alberto De Luca, Raffaele Di Vuolo)

With Judgment no. 12632/2021 of 12 May 2021, the Court of Cassation once again addressed the issue of employee transfer due to environmental incompatibility in the workplace, ruling out that this amounts to mobbing if the transfer is not intended to persecute the employee, rather to restore serenity in the workplace. The ruling derives from a case brought by a commander of the Ancona Municipal police force to obtain compensation for damages suffered as a result of persecutory conduct of the Municipality, which had ultimately transferred the commander to a different office. The Court of Appeal of Ancona, confirming the decision of the first instance court, held that the claimant’s requests were groundless; specifically, it held that the transfer had taken place “in a situation of difficult interpersonal relations which exacerbated tensions and problems to the extent that it certainly represented a condition of environmental incompatibility”. The claimant appealed against this decision before the Court of Cassation. The Court, with order no. 26684/2017, partially upheld the appeal and referred the case back to the Court of Appeal of Ancona, which, considering the shortcomings in the motivation, was to proceed with a new assessment of the case in accordance with the principles of law referred to by the Court of Cassation whereby “the qualifying element of mobbing is not the lawfulness or unlawfulness of individual acts, rather the persecutory intent that unifies them, which must be proven by the person who claims to have suffered the harassing conduct and which the trial judge must ascertain or exclude, taking into account all the circumstances of the case”.

Continue reading the full version published on Il Quotidiano del Lavoro of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…