Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: Patto di non concorrenza


7 Sep 2021

Non-competition agreement: the payment is valid even if paid during employment (Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto – Il Sole 24 Ore, 7 September 2021 – Alberto De Luca, Roberta Padula)

The Court of Cassation, with order no. 23418 of 25 August 2021, returned to deal with the subject of requirements for validity of non-competition agreements. The Court’s ruling is based on appeal lodged by a bank manager who (among other claims submitted) had challenged a signed non-competition agreement, considering it vitiated, since the payment was paid during employment and was random and at any rate inconsistent, thus amounting to a violation of the requirement cited in art. 2125 of the Italian Civil Code. In the case in question, the non-competition agreement included the manager’s commitment not to perform, in certain regions of north and central Italy, similar activities or duties as those performed for the Bank for the duration of three months, for a payment equal to 10,000 euro per annum, to pay annually together with the monthly salary.

The Court of Milan, asked to rule on the merits, had acknowledged and declared the nullity of the non-competition agreement, and with that releasing the manager from payment of the penalties for breaching it, however sentencing the plaintiff to return the sum received as payment. During the next challenge of the ruling, the Milan Court of Appeals, overturned the decision of the lower court on the point, declaring the non-competition agreement valid holding that no irregularity existed (in terms of randomness or inconsistency) regarding the quantification of the payment that, on the contrary could, according to the Court, be validly paid during employment along with remuneration. Objecting to the higher court’s ruling, the manager lodged an appeal with the Court of Cassation.

Continue reading the full version published in Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…