Categories: News, Events

Tag: Agenti di Commercio, Influencers


18 Nov 2024

HR Virtual Breakfast: “Influencers – agents: how much is an #adv likely to cost?” (De Luca & Partners e HR Capital, 26 November 2024)

A recent ruling of the Court of Rome (no. 2615, dated March 4th, 2024) addressed, for the first time in Italy, the issue of the correct legal classification of the so-called “influencers”.

According to this ruling, an influencerwho promotes a company’s products on a stable and continuous basis should be classified as an agent.

Needless to say that the aforementioned ruling has particularly significant consequences for the principal. Just to mention the main ones:

(i)          contribution charges towards Italian social security authority for agents,

(ii)        indemnities and rights provided for by the Italian Civil Code (e.g.: indemnity for termination of agency relationship, implementing Directive 86/653/CEE),

(iii)       administrative obligations,

(iv)       regularization of ongoing contracts,

(v)         management of interlocutions with Italian social security authority for agents,

(vi)       management of authorities’ inspection processes,

(vii)      need for legal assistance in disputes brought by influencers or arising out of authorities’ inspection processes.

By the way, please consider that under Italian Law, the obligation to pay social security contributions also applies to agents (and possibly to influencers) constituted as corporations.

Thanks to our in-depth experience in the field of agency law, we are at your disposal to provide you with all the support you may need for the management and resolution of issues related to the above.

If you want to delve deeper into the topic, you can read the interview published on The Platform.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…