Categories: Insights · News, Interviews


5 Jul 2016

The problem with dismissals “Here two different sets of rules seem to apply” (Quotidiano Nazionale, 6 July 2016 – Vittorio De Luca)

The “increased protection based on seniority” of the new contract, applies to hirings after 7 March 2015. For the others article 18 is still valid, a dual system with many paradoxes.

A dual dismissal system, where legislation uses double standards, based on the categories of workers. This is the scenario that, according to Vittorio De Luca, lawyer of the De Luca & Partners law firm, was created in the Italian job market after the approval of the Jobs Act, the welfare reform of the Renzi government. As those who follow the news know well, the Jobs Act eliminated article 18 of the Workers’ Statute. As of last year, the obligation to reinstate the worker only exists in limited cases, for example when the employee is fired by the company for discriminatory reasons (for example for racial prejudice).

In most cases (for example when the worker is dismissed for disciplinary reasons), the reinstatement obligation no longer exists; the worker only has the right to a cash indemnity, proportional to the years of seniority, even if the dismissal is declared unlawful. Thus, a new employment contract was created, called “increased protection based on seniority” because it includes protection against dismissals that increases over time.  However, this new contract, only applies to hirings after 7 March 2015. For employees who already worked prior to this date, the rules of the old article 18 are still valid, in effect before approval of the Jobs Act.

And it is precisely for this reason, according to De Luca, that with the latest reform a dual system was created. “It has the paradoxical consequence”, stated the lawyer, “that two employees of the same company, dismissed for the same reason and at the same time, may have the right to a radically different protection, based on the date they were hired”. In the presence of an unjust dismissal, whoever was employed before the arrival of the Jobs Act, has the right to be reinstated in their position, unlike a colleague who was hired after 7 March 2015. This limit of the reform also emerged in a survey conducted by De Luca & Partners, on a sample of more than 200 companies. The interviewed companies, even if they expressed a positive evaluation of the Jobs Act, reported that the greatest obstacle to hiring in Italy is still represented by labour costs that are too high.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…