Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: Dismissal, Licenziamento


4 Aug 2021

Clock-on scam: plea bargaining has binding effect in civil dismissal proceedings (Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto – Il Sole 24 Ore, 4 August 2021 – Alberto De Luca, Alessandra Zilla)

The Court of Cassation, in ruling no. 20560 published on 19 July 2021 confirmed the facts subject of a plea bargain in a criminal case must be established (with the effect of res judicata) to any pending civil proceedings concerning the same findings. The Supreme Court’s ruling stems from the lawful dismissal for misconduct by the Ministry of Justice of a court clerk for having – together with other colleagues – falsely certified his presence at work.

The parties were first involved in a criminal trial that ended with a plea bargain. Later the employee appeared before the Employment Tribunal to the appeal against the employment termination. In the employment proceedings, the Court of Appeal of Milan, overturned the judgement of the Court of Lodi which had initially upheld the employee’s appeal, ruled on the legitimacy of the disciplinary dismissal imposed on the employee. It found (based on the plea bargain) that an unlawful system was operating at the judicial office in which certain employees covered for each other’s tardiness and absences by abusing the clock-in badge system.

The seriousness of the conduct was further increased by the fact that the appellant was the chief registrar. The employee challenged the judgement handed down by the local Court on several grounds, including the alleged infringement of Articles 115 and 2697 of the Code of Civil Procedure about availability and burden of proof, since the Court of Appeal based its belief on facts established in the criminal proceedings. In the employee’s view, the plea-bargaining judgement could not have been used as a basis for the employment judge’s finding because it came after the dismissal and was incapable of providing elements for assessing the actual existence of the act and its seriousness. The grounds of appeal were rejected by the Supreme Court, which confirmed the dismissal legitimacy.

Continue reading the full version published in Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…