Categories: Insights


16 Jun 2015

Employment procedures defined by contracts or by the ministry (Il Sole 24 Ore, 17 June 2015, Page 41)

Temporary work (or job on call) is an employment contract whereby the worker makes himself available for non-continuous or temporary work, identified by national collective or territorial bargaining, or for pre-set periods during the week, month or year. Job on call includes the payment of an on call indemnity if the employee is required to work when the employer calls. Age and days As with the previous law (Italian Legislative Decree 276/2003), work performances of a temporary nature can be carried out based on needs established by national collective or territorial bargaining, or defined by ministerial decree, including in reference to the possibility of stipulating such contract in pre-set periods during the week, month or year. In terms of subjective requirements, the contract may only be stipulated with workers under 24 or over 55: in both cases, considering three calendar years, it is not possible to exceed 400 days of effective work for each worker with the same employer. The tourism, food and beverage and entertainment sectors are exceptions to this rule. With reference to the case of unjustified refusal by the worker to respond to the employer’s call, this circumstance can still constitute a reason for dismissal and entail the return of the on call indemnity quota related to the period after the unjustified refusal, but does not refer (as included in the current law) also to a “compensation for damages” in the amount established in collective contracts or the employment contract. Exclusions The ban on using temporary work remains in force in three cases: first of all, to replace striking workers; secondly, in production units where layoff procedures, suspensions or reductions in working hours for workers with the same duties have been started in the previous 6 months; lastly, when the employer has failed to perform a risk assessment. With reference to the second case, it should be noted that the ban is mandatory, while the corresponding current law permits trade union agreements to contain a different provision. Moreover, there is a dual notification/information obligation: before the beginning of the job performance or of an integrated cycle of performances with a duration not exceeding 30 days, the employer must communicate the duration to the territorial employment office using electronic procedures, and, on an annual basis at least, the employer must inform the trade union representatives (Italian RSA and RSU) of the trend in using temporary work.

Source:

Il Sole 24 Ore

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…