Categorie: Insights, Normativa · News

Tag: Dismissal, GDPR, Licenziamento, Privacy


3 Lug 2025

E-mail aziendale e navigazione Internet: il Garante Privacy emette la prima sanzione per conservazione illegittima dei metadati delle mail aziendali e dei log di navigazione

The employer may collect employees’ Internet browsing logs and email metadata only under specific conditions and safeguards. This was affirmed by the Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante Privacy”) when imposing a €50,000 fine on the Lombardy Region” (Provision No. 243 of April 29, 2025).

As stated on the Authority’s official website, this ruling follows an inspection aimed at verifying the Region’s compliance with privacy regulations concerning the processing of employee data. The measure comes almost a year after the publication of the guidance document titled “Programs and IT services for managing e-mail in the workplace and the processing of metadata” (Provision No. 364 of June 6, 2024).

Although this case specifically involved public administration, it is worth clarifying that all findings, observations, and clarifications issued by the Authority fully apply to private-sector data controllers as well.

Metadata and Internet browsing logs

“Metadata” refers to information related to the sending, receiving, and routing of messages. This may include the sender’s and recipient’s email addresses, IP addresses of the servers or clients involved in message routing, timestamps of sending, retransmission or receipt, message size, presence and size of any attachments, and, in certain cases depending on the email management system used, even the subject of the sent or received message.

Browsing logs, on the other hand, allow tracking of activities during web navigation and contain data such as visited IP addresses, URLs of opened web pages, connection times and durations, type of device and browser used, as well as any downloads or uploads performed.

The June 6, 2024, guidance clarifies that the maximum retention period for such data is 21 days. Any retention beyond this period is permissible only under specific conditions that justify the extension, and, in any case, one of the safeguards provided by Italian law under Article 4 of Law No. 300/1970 (the Workers’ Statute) must be satisfied: (i) an agreement with trade unions or, failing that, (ii) authorization from the local Labour Inspectorate.

This is because all such information allows the employer to identify behavioral patterns, understand workers’ relationships and habits, and infer elements such as performance and productivity. In other words, it may amount to indirect remote monitoring of employees’ activities.

Violations detected and sanctions imposed

During the Authority’s inspection, it emerged that the Region retained:

  • E-mail metadata for 90 days — violation resulting in a €20,000 fine for unlawful data processing,
  • Internet browsing logs for 12 months — violation resulting in a €25,000 fine,
  • Help desk ticket registry data for 10 years — violation resulting in a €5,000 fine.

Recommended actions to ensure compliance with current legislation?

  • Provide information notices to all data subjects concerned.
  • Conduct a legitimate interest assessment and a data protection impact assessment to evaluate and mitigate risks.
  • Define data retention periods in line with current legislation and the Authority’s guidelines or, where specific needs arise (which must be justified and demonstrated), fulfill one of the safeguard conditions under Article 4 of the Workers’ Statute.
  • Update and align internal documentation accordingly.
  • Restrict access to such data exclusively to specifically authorized personnel.
  • Respect the principle of data minimization and implement adequate security measures, such as encrypting metadata and logs.
  • Update contracts with third-party providers to ensure compliance with Article 28 of the GDPR.
  • Continuously monitor compliance levels and, where necessary, implement appropriate updates and improvements.

Other related Insights:

Iscriviti alla newsletter

Contattaci

Hai bisogno di informazioni? Scrivici e il nostro team di esperti ti risponderà il prima possibile.

Compila il form

Altre news e insights

1 Set 2026

File aziendali eliminati dal PC: licenziamento legittimo anche senza prova del danno

La vicenda trae origine dal licenziamento disciplinare intimato a una dipendente con funzioni di segreteria generale che, in occasione della restituzione del computer aziendale a seguito di un…

1 Set 2026

Lavoro straordinario: non basta un prospetto riepilogativo, il lavoratore deve provare in modo rigoroso ore e quantità della prestazione

Con l’ordinanza n. 20700 del 18 giugno 2026, la Corte di Cassazione è tornata a pronunciarsi in materia di lavoro straordinario, ribadendo che il lavoratore che ne rivendichi…

1 Set 2026

Lo sai che… il superminimo rimasto invariato per anni può diventare non assorbibile?

La Corte di Cassazione, Sezione Lavoro, con sentenza n. 24475 del 5 agosto 2026, ha confermato che il superminimo individuale, pur essendo normalmente soggetto al principio dell’assorbimento nei…

3 Ago 2026

Trasparenza salariale, in arrivo le prime richieste dai dipendenti (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 agosto 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

A due mesi dal decreto. Dall’entrata in vigore del Dlgs 96/2026, il 7 giugno, secondo una survey flash condotta da Gidp, l’8% dei direttori delle risorse umane ha…

30 Lug 2026

Controlli aziendali e tutela dei dati: quale equilibrio?

Con una recente sentenza del Tribunale di Pisa n. 800 del 13 giugno 2026 si affronta un tema di particolare interesse per le aziende: il delicato equilibrio tra…

30 Lug 2026

Licenziamento illegittimo e reintegra: il lavoratore deve restituire l’indennità di preavviso 

Con l’ordinanza n. 22187 del 28 giugno 2026, la Corte di Cassazione si è pronunciata sul tema della restituzione dell’indennità sostitutiva del preavviso corrisposta al lavoratore in caso…