Categories: News

Tag: Dismissal, GDPR, Privacy


3 Jul 2025

First fine for unlawful retention of corporate e-mail metadata and internet logs by Italian Data Protection Authority

The employer may collect employees’ Internet browsing logs and email metadata only under specific conditions and safeguards. This was affirmed by the Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante Privacy”) when imposing a €50,000 fine on the Lombardy Region” (Provision No. 243 of April 29, 2025).

As stated on the Authority’s official website, this ruling follows an inspection aimed at verifying the Region’s compliance with privacy regulations concerning the processing of employee data. The measure comes almost a year after the publication of the guidance document titled “Programs and IT services for managing e-mail in the workplace and the processing of metadata” (Provision No. 364 of June 6, 2024).

Although this case specifically involved public administration, it is worth clarifying that all findings, observations, and clarifications issued by the Authority fully apply to private-sector data controllers as well.

Metadata and Internet browsing logs

“Metadata” refers to information related to the sending, receiving, and routing of messages. This may include the sender’s and recipient’s email addresses, IP addresses of the servers or clients involved in message routing, timestamps of sending, retransmission or receipt, message size, presence and size of any attachments, and, in certain cases depending on the email management system used, even the subject of the sent or received message.

Browsing logs, on the other hand, allow tracking of activities during web navigation and contain data such as visited IP addresses, URLs of opened web pages, connection times and durations, type of device and browser used, as well as any downloads or uploads performed.

The June 6, 2024, guidance clarifies that the maximum retention period for such data is 21 days. Any retention beyond this period is permissible only under specific conditions that justify the extension, and, in any case, one of the safeguards provided by Italian law under Article 4 of Law No. 300/1970 (the Workers’ Statute) must be satisfied: (i) an agreement with trade unions or, failing that, (ii) authorization from the local Labour Inspectorate.

This is because all such information allows the employer to identify behavioral patterns, understand workers’ relationships and habits, and infer elements such as performance and productivity. In other words, it may amount to indirect remote monitoring of employees’ activities.

Violations detected and sanctions imposed

During the Authority’s inspection, it emerged that the Region retained:

  • E-mail metadata for 90 days — violation resulting in a €20,000 fine for unlawful data processing,
  • Internet browsing logs for 12 months — violation resulting in a €25,000 fine,
  • Help desk ticket registry data for 10 years — violation resulting in a €5,000 fine.

Recommended actions to ensure compliance with current legislation?

  • Provide information notices to all data subjects concerned.
  • Conduct a legitimate interest assessment and a data protection impact assessment to evaluate and mitigate risks.
  • Define data retention periods in line with current legislation and the Authority’s guidelines or, where specific needs arise (which must be justified and demonstrated), fulfill one of the safeguard conditions under Article 4 of the Workers’ Statute.
  • Update and align internal documentation accordingly.
  • Restrict access to such data exclusively to specifically authorized personnel.
  • Respect the principle of data minimization and implement adequate security measures, such as encrypting metadata and logs.
  • Update contracts with third-party providers to ensure compliance with Article 28 of the GDPR.
  • Continuously monitor compliance levels and, where necessary, implement appropriate updates and improvements.

Other related Insights:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…