Categories: News

Tag: Dismissal, GDPR, Privacy


3 Jul 2025

First fine for unlawful retention of corporate e-mail metadata and internet logs by Italian Data Protection Authority

“The employer may collect employees’ Internet browsing logs and email metadata only under specific conditions and safeguards. This was affirmed by the Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante Privacy”) when imposing a €50,000 fine on the Lombardy Region” (Provision No. 243 of April 29, 2025).

As stated on the Authority’s official website, this ruling follows an inspection aimed at verifying the Region’s compliance with privacy regulations concerning the processing of employee data. The measure comes almost a year after the publication of the guidance document titled “Programs and IT services for managing e-mail in the workplace and the processing of metadata” (Provision No. 364 of June 6, 2024).

Although this case specifically involved public administration, it is worth clarifying that all findings, observations, and clarifications issued by the Authority fully apply to private-sector data controllers as well.

Metadata and Internet browsing logs

“Metadata” refers to information related to the sending, receiving, and routing of messages. This may include the sender’s and recipient’s email addresses, IP addresses of the servers or clients involved in message routing, timestamps of sending, retransmission or receipt, message size, presence and size of any attachments, and, in certain cases depending on the email management system used, even the subject of the sent or received message.

Browsing logs, on the other hand, allow tracking of activities during web navigation and contain data such as visited IP addresses, URLs of opened web pages, connection times and durations, type of device and browser used, as well as any downloads or uploads performed.

The June 6, 2024, guidance clarifies that the maximum retention period for such data is 21 days. Any retention beyond this period is permissible only under specific conditions that justify the extension, and, in any case, one of the safeguards provided by Italian law under Article 4 of Law No. 300/1970 (the Workers’ Statute) must be satisfied: (i) an agreement with trade unions or, failing that, (ii) authorization from the local Labour Inspectorate.

This is because all such information allows the employer to identify behavioral patterns, understand workers’ relationships and habits, and infer elements such as performance and productivity. In other words, it may amount to indirect remote monitoring of employees’ activities.

Violations detected and sanctions imposed

During the Authority’s inspection, it emerged that the Region retained:

  • E-mail metadata for 90 days — violation resulting in a €20,000 fine for unlawful data processing,
  • Internet browsing logs for 12 months — violation resulting in a €25,000 fine,
  • Help desk ticket registry data for 10 years — violation resulting in a €5,000 fine.

Recommended actions to ensure compliance with current legislation?

  • Provide information notices to all data subjects concerned.
  • Conduct a legitimate interest assessment and a data protection impact assessment to evaluate and mitigate risks.
  • Define data retention periods in line with current legislation and the Authority’s guidelines or, where specific needs arise (which must be justified and demonstrated), fulfill one of the safeguard conditions under Article 4 of the Workers’ Statute.
  • Update and align internal documentation accordingly.
  • Restrict access to such data exclusively to specifically authorized personnel.
  • Respect the principle of data minimization and implement adequate security measures, such as encrypting metadata and logs.
  • Update contracts with third-party providers to ensure compliance with Article 28 of the GDPR.
  • Continuously monitor compliance levels and, where necessary, implement appropriate updates and improvements.

Other related Insights:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

22 Oct 2026

Access to NASpI in light of recent case law (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 22 October 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), established by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the main income support measure for employees who have involuntarily…

19 Oct 2026

From Innovation to Governance: The Impact of the AI Act on HR Processes, between Compliance, Transparency and Accountability (AIDP – HR Online, 19 October 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Martina De Angela)

In recent years, artificial intelligence has evolved from an experimental technology into a tool that is increasingly integrated into the day-to-day activities of HR functions. Among other things,…

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…