Categories: Insights, Case Law


2 Apr 2018

Electronic signature required in case of dismissal based on email correspondence

The Court of Cassation with judgement no. 5523 filed on 8 March 2018, has dealt inter alia with the issue of the validity of a dismissal for just cause imposed on the basis of the contents of a few emails sent from the email address of a worker recipient of the dismissal and therefore of their probative value. The evaluation of the Court appeals to a lack of absolute certainty in attributing the messages “to their apparent author”, as these have no electronic signature and therefore lack the nature of private deed pursuant to Article 2702, Italian Civil Code. In this regard, the Court stressed that traditional emails (such as those produced in the proceedings by the company and on which the dismissal was based) are modifiable and unable to ensure identification of their author. Therefore, in the Court’s opinion, these emails are, in accordance to Article 21, Legislative Decree 82/2005 (so-called Digital Administration Code) electronic documents subject to the free interpretation of trial courts. In the light of this reasoning, the Court concluded that the appeal of the employer against the judgement of the Court of Appeal having jurisdiction is groundless, which, reversing the judgement of the court of first instance, had found the dismissal invalid and condemned the same to pay the supplementary indemnity and the substitute allowance in place of the prior notice.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…