Categories: Insights, Case Law


2 Apr 2018

Electronic signature required in case of dismissal based on email correspondence

The Court of Cassation with judgement no. 5523 filed on 8 March 2018, has dealt inter alia with the issue of the validity of a dismissal for just cause imposed on the basis of the contents of a few emails sent from the email address of a worker recipient of the dismissal and therefore of their probative value. The evaluation of the Court appeals to a lack of absolute certainty in attributing the messages “to their apparent author”, as these have no electronic signature and therefore lack the nature of private deed pursuant to Article 2702, Italian Civil Code. In this regard, the Court stressed that traditional emails (such as those produced in the proceedings by the company and on which the dismissal was based) are modifiable and unable to ensure identification of their author. Therefore, in the Court’s opinion, these emails are, in accordance to Article 21, Legislative Decree 82/2005 (so-called Digital Administration Code) electronic documents subject to the free interpretation of trial courts. In the light of this reasoning, the Court concluded that the appeal of the employer against the judgement of the Court of Appeal having jurisdiction is groundless, which, reversing the judgement of the court of first instance, had found the dismissal invalid and condemned the same to pay the supplementary indemnity and the substitute allowance in place of the prior notice.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…