Categories: Insights · News, Interviews

Tag: GDPR, Metadati


3 Jul 2024

Company e-mail and metadata: the Italian Data Protection Authority updates the guideline document (Economy Magazine, July 1, 2024 – Vittorio De Luca, Martina De Angeli)

The Italian Data Protection Authority (‘IDPA’) recently returned to the issue of corporate email metadata retention by the employer. The order of 6 June 2024, entitled “Computer programs and services for the management of e-mail in the workplace and processing of metadata”, extends the retention period for metadata from 7 to 21 days. This new decision, no. 364 of 6 June 2024, arrives several weeks after the publication of a first version of the guidance document on metadata retention, which had given rise to confusion and discussions among professionals to the point of leading the IDPA to start a public consultation.

What is metadata

First of all, however, it is necessary to clarify the definition of “metadata”. This term does not mean information contained in the “body” of the email but rather the information relating to the sending, receiving and sorting the messages. This may include the email addresses of the sender and of the recipient, the IP addresses of the servers or clients involved in the routing of the message, the times of sending, retransmission or reception, the size of the message, the presence and size of any attachments and, in certain cases, depending on the email management system used, may also include the subject of the message sent or received.

As mentioned above, the IDPA’s guidelines have extended the retention period to 21 days, a time period which is, in any event, to be considered indicative.

Metadata retention beyond this time frame is only permitted if particular conditions making the extension necessary are satisfied and adequately proven.

Continue reading the full version at Economy Magazine.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…