Categories: Insights, Publications


5 Mar 2019

Reinstatement of a job position after 7 months does not affect the lawfulness of a dismissal (Il Quotidiano del Lavoro de Il Sole 24 Ore, 6 March 2019 – Alberto De Luca, Gabriele Scafati)

By way of judgment No. 4672 filed on 18 February 2019, the Court of Cassation has once again ruled on the lawfulness of dismissal for elimination of a job position when such position is reinstated a few months after the employer’s termination of the employment relationship.

The case refers to an electronics engineer specialised in measurement systems who was employed as the Compliance manager of the Italian subsidiary of a Japanese multinational, in a “Middle Manager” role as the person in charge of “metrology”. More specifically, the employee was dismissed on justified objective grounds, having her job position been eliminated following the repeal of a provision governing the monitoring activities tasked to her, which were no longer required.

The employee promptly appealed the dismissal, objecting, inter alia, that the company had then reinstated the position just 7 months after the suppression. The trial court judgments both concluded with the rejection of the employee’s claims, holding that the actual elimination of the position and the time elapsed between the elimination and reinstatement of the position represented reasonable grounds to justify an organisational change within the company requiring the reinstatement of the previously eliminated position.

Brought before the Court of Cassation, the employee’s action failed to achieve a different outcome. In its ruling on the only plea of the appeal, whereby the employee claimed that the judges in charge had erred in their assessment of the allocation of the burden of proof and of the related satisfaction criteria (with particular regard to that allocated to the employer), the Court of Cassation found the appellant’s claims to be once again unfounded. On this point, it is interesting to note how emphasis has been placed on the time elapsing between the elimination and the reinstatement of the position previously held by the dismissed employee, with the Court confirming that no errors were made in rulings of the trial courts, which had deemed the time period of seven months to be reasonable (just as the Court of Cassation, in judgment No. 11413 of 11 May 2018, had deemed a period of 8 months to be reasonable) and therefore not capable of affecting or nullifying the validity of the dismissal…

 

Click here to continue reading the note to the judgment published in Il Quotidiano del Lavoro of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…