Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: condotta antisindacale, relazioni industriali


30 Sep 2022

Unilateral termination of an enterprise bargaining agreement is anti-union (Newsletter Norme & Tributi n. 162 Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica – Vittorio De Luca, Elena Cannone)

By an order of 25 April 2022, the Court of Bologna held that the early termination by the employer, effective immediately, of the financial aspects of an enterprise bargaining agreement is anti-union behaviour. The contract in question was valid from 1 June 2019 to 31 March 2023 and was to be renewed year by year, unless terminated by either party with 6 months’ prior notice. The agreement also covered several emoluments, and had been supplemented in February 2020 by providing that said emoluments would be paid on certain dates in 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 to those staff who planned to use, in each year, the current annual leaves and part of the annual leave accrued in prior periods. The Court held that it was “utterly unlawful” for the employer to stop applying the financial clauses of the Agreement and paying the emoluments in question, based on the general lack of planning of the current and past annual leaves on the part of a few employees. In the Court’s view, there was no contractual provision or employee conduct that could justify the termination. The employer’s Termination “harms the image and credibility of the union that negotiated the agreements later disregarded”.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…