Categories: Insights, Do you know that

Tag: Datore di lavoro, trasferimento, worker transfer


8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation of environmental incompatibility (i.e. “incompatibilità ambientale”), regardless of whether any disciplinary liability can be attributed to the employee.

In the case at hand, an employee working at the premises of a client company within the framework of a service contract had been removed from that site following the withdrawal of the client’s approval, which prevented her from continuing to perform her duties at the production facility. The employer – a cooperative – therefore arranged for her relocation to a different company site.

The employee challenged the measure: the Court of first instance rejected the claim, considering the relocation lawful; conversely, the Court of Appeal of Florence overturned the first-instance decision, classifying the measure as a transfer pursuant to Article 2103 of the Italian Civil Code and finding that the employer had failed to provide adequate evidence of the technical, organisational and production-related reasons required to justify it.

The company appealed to the Italian Supreme Court, arguing, inter alia, that the appellate court had failed to consider the specific situation arising at the client’s premises, characterised by the withdrawal of approval and the consequent impossibility of assigning the employee to that site.

The Supreme Court upheld the appeal, first clarifying that, in order to qualify as a transfer in the technical sense, there must be a movement from one production unit to another; not every change of workplace qualifies as such, particularly where the locations are in close proximity and part of the same organisational structure.

The Court further reiterated that a transfer does not constitute a disciplinary sanction, but rather an organisational measure. From this perspective, situations of incompatibility with the working environment, where they negatively affect the proper performance of work activities, may constitute the technical, organisational and production-related requirements referred to in Article 2103 of the Italian Civil Code.

It was also specified that, in such circumstances, the employer is not required to prove any fault on the part of the employee nor that the transfer represents the only possible solution, it being sufficient that it constitutes a reasonable organisational choice capable of ensuring the proper functioning of the business.

In conclusion, the decision confirms that the withdrawal of approval by the client and the resulting environmental incompatibility may justify the transfer of an employee, even in the absence of fault, provided that the measure is genuinely linked to organisational needs and does not have a punitive nature. 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…