Categories: Insights, Do you know that

Tag: Datore di lavoro, trasferimento, worker transfer


8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation of environmental incompatibility (i.e. “incompatibilità ambientale”), regardless of whether any disciplinary liability can be attributed to the employee.

In the case at hand, an employee working at the premises of a client company within the framework of a service contract had been removed from that site following the withdrawal of the client’s approval, which prevented her from continuing to perform her duties at the production facility. The employer – a cooperative – therefore arranged for her relocation to a different company site.

The employee challenged the measure: the Court of first instance rejected the claim, considering the relocation lawful; conversely, the Court of Appeal of Florence overturned the first-instance decision, classifying the measure as a transfer pursuant to Article 2103 of the Italian Civil Code and finding that the employer had failed to provide adequate evidence of the technical, organisational and production-related reasons required to justify it.

The company appealed to the Italian Supreme Court, arguing, inter alia, that the appellate court had failed to consider the specific situation arising at the client’s premises, characterised by the withdrawal of approval and the consequent impossibility of assigning the employee to that site.

The Supreme Court upheld the appeal, first clarifying that, in order to qualify as a transfer in the technical sense, there must be a movement from one production unit to another; not every change of workplace qualifies as such, particularly where the locations are in close proximity and part of the same organisational structure.

The Court further reiterated that a transfer does not constitute a disciplinary sanction, but rather an organisational measure. From this perspective, situations of incompatibility with the working environment, where they negatively affect the proper performance of work activities, may constitute the technical, organisational and production-related requirements referred to in Article 2103 of the Italian Civil Code.

It was also specified that, in such circumstances, the employer is not required to prove any fault on the part of the employee nor that the transfer represents the only possible solution, it being sufficient that it constitutes a reasonable organisational choice capable of ensuring the proper functioning of the business.

In conclusion, the decision confirms that the withdrawal of approval by the client and the resulting environmental incompatibility may justify the transfer of an employee, even in the absence of fault, provided that the measure is genuinely linked to organisational needs and does not have a punitive nature. 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…