Categories: Insights, Case Law


25 Jul 2016

Court of Appeal in Milan: messages in a mailing list protected like private correspondence

The Court of Appeal in Milan, in its ruling No. 439/2016, confirmed the principle that e-mail messages exchanged among employees as part of a mailing list, constitute private correspondence and therefore fall into the category of protected communications of a personal nature. According to the Court, the personality of the communication “lies in the predetermination of the recipients, which the sender wishes to send their e-mail message to – those persons and not others”. The case in question concerns an action brought by an airline pilot sacked for misconduct for instigating colleagues to engage in trade-union activity contrary to the employer’s obligations. In support of the grounds for dismissal, the employers produced the emails exchanged between the person concerned and his colleagues, highlighting the damage caused by these actions. Nevertheless, the territorial Court, sticking to the position already taken in the past by the Italian Data Protection Authority stated that emails that circulate within mailing lists, just like paper-based correspondence, must be treated in the same way as correspondence that is closed and inviolable by third parties (Editor’s Note: in this case, the employer)” and, thus, falling under the protection of Article 15 of the Italian Constitution. In this way, the judges deemed the grounds given for the dismissal as unfounded, because it lacked any evidence that could legitimise the employer’s actions.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…