Categories: Insights, Legislation

Tag: Committente, Jobs Act


29 May 2017

Self-Employment Jobs Act: main developments

With the final approval of the so called Self-employment Jobs Act – currently pending publication in the Official Gazette – a reform of the Italian laws has been introduced with the goal of providing financial-social protection to self-employed individuals that do not carry out their activity through a business. From a financial protection standpoint, the provision deems as illicit, with the consequent right of the self-employed individual to receive reimbursement for damages, the clauses (i) that assign to the client the right to withdraw from the agreement without adequate prior notice as well as to modify unilaterally the terms thereby specified and (ii) for which the parties agree to payment terms exceeding 60 days. Similarly, the behaviour of a client who refuses to sign a written agreement is deemed illicit. Also in such case, the self-employed worker shall have the right to receive reimbursement for damages. In addition, also in force are the application of the discipline governing the abuse of economic dependence and the recognition of the self-employed worker’s rights related to the financial exploitation of original creations and inventions developed while performing the contract, except where the creative activity is the actual scope of the agreement and is compensated accordingly. These are only a few of the main developments introduced by the Self-employment Jobs Act, but they seem already sufficient to lead clients to carefully assess the possibility of entering into adequate agreements for the already existing relationships, as well as for any future ones, with self-employed workers.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…