Categories: Insights, Legislation

Tag: Committente, Jobs Act


29 May 2017

Self-Employment Jobs Act: main developments

With the final approval of the so called Self-employment Jobs Act – currently pending publication in the Official Gazette – a reform of the Italian laws has been introduced with the goal of providing financial-social protection to self-employed individuals that do not carry out their activity through a business. From a financial protection standpoint, the provision deems as illicit, with the consequent right of the self-employed individual to receive reimbursement for damages, the clauses (i) that assign to the client the right to withdraw from the agreement without adequate prior notice as well as to modify unilaterally the terms thereby specified and (ii) for which the parties agree to payment terms exceeding 60 days. Similarly, the behaviour of a client who refuses to sign a written agreement is deemed illicit. Also in such case, the self-employed worker shall have the right to receive reimbursement for damages. In addition, also in force are the application of the discipline governing the abuse of economic dependence and the recognition of the self-employed worker’s rights related to the financial exploitation of original creations and inventions developed while performing the contract, except where the creative activity is the actual scope of the agreement and is compensated accordingly. These are only a few of the main developments introduced by the Self-employment Jobs Act, but they seem already sufficient to lead clients to carefully assess the possibility of entering into adequate agreements for the already existing relationships, as well as for any future ones, with self-employed workers.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…