Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: Datore di lavoro


25 Aug 2020

Court of Justice of the European Union – 16 July 2020 Ruling – Case C-658/18

The Court of Justice of the European Union, with its judgement of 16 July 2020 ruled on case C-610/18, and established that the actual “employer” should be considered the company that exercises authority over an employee, bears the corresponding wage cost and possesses the actual power to dismiss the employee, and not the company that only signs the employment contract, with the consequence that the employment is subject to the rules of the country where the real employer is established.

The case in question originates from a dispute started in the Netherlands by a company established in Cyprus that had signed employment contracts with international lorry divers resident in the Netherlands; based on these contracts the Cypriot company was designated as employer and stated that its legislation was applicable to the employment relationship. However, the employees had never lived or worked in Cyprus before these contracts and during their effectiveness they continued to live in the Netherlands.

The Dutch national court, taking into account these circumstances, declared the legislation of the Netherlands applicable to the lorry drivers’ employment in terms of social security and invested the Court of Justice of the European Union with the task of explaining if such employees should be considered as “part of the personnel” of the company with the formal position of employer or if, instead, they should be considered employees of the company at whose disposal they were at for at unlimited period of time.

The EU court hearing the case explained that signing of a job contract can be an indication of the existence of an employment relationship between the employee and company, but that alone may not be enough; it is also necessary to take into account the way in which the contract obligations are actually performed.

Therefore, regardless of the literal contents of the contract, the real employer is the entity whose authority is applicable to the worker, and who must bear the corresponding wages cost and who possesses the actual power for dismissal. The Court also stated that the objective of regulation 1408/71 is to ensure the free circulation of employees and self-employed workers within the European Union, but to comply with the particularities of national legislation concerning social security as well.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

6 Feb 2026

Pay equity and transparency: draft implementing decree presented

Italy is among the first Member States to have adopted the draft implementing legislative decree of EU Directive 2023/970, which yesterday received its initial approval from the Council…

30 Jan 2026

A conviction for stalking can justify dismissal for just cause

With Ordinance No. 32952 of 17 December 2025, the Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, ruled that a final conviction for stalking and abuse can justify dismissal for just…

30 Jan 2026

We continue to be a Great Place to Work!

For the third consecutive year, De Luca & Partners has been awarded the prestigious Great Place to Work® certification, a significant recognition of the value we place on…

29 Jan 2026

Italian Supreme Court: Employer Monitoring and the Use of Corporate Chats for Disciplinary Purposes

Corporate chats “intended for work-related communications by employees accessing them through company accounts constitute work tools, pursuant to Article 4, paragraph 2, of Law No. 300 of 1970,…

28 Jan 2026

Anti-union conduct: the Supreme Court moves beyond formalism and focuses on substance

With order no. 789 of 14 January 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of anti-union conduct by employers in relation to information and consultation obligations on…

27 Jan 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the use of artificial intelligence may justify a dismissal for objective justified reason?

With Judgment No. 9135 of November 19, 2025, the Labour Section of the Court of Rome held that the dismissal for objective justified reason (i.e. “giustificato motivo oggettivo”,…