Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: Datore di lavoro


25 Aug 2020

Court of Justice of the European Union – 16 July 2020 Ruling – Case C-658/18

The Court of Justice of the European Union, with its judgement of 16 July 2020 ruled on case C-610/18, and established that the actual “employer” should be considered the company that exercises authority over an employee, bears the corresponding wage cost and possesses the actual power to dismiss the employee, and not the company that only signs the employment contract, with the consequence that the employment is subject to the rules of the country where the real employer is established.

The case in question originates from a dispute started in the Netherlands by a company established in Cyprus that had signed employment contracts with international lorry divers resident in the Netherlands; based on these contracts the Cypriot company was designated as employer and stated that its legislation was applicable to the employment relationship. However, the employees had never lived or worked in Cyprus before these contracts and during their effectiveness they continued to live in the Netherlands.

The Dutch national court, taking into account these circumstances, declared the legislation of the Netherlands applicable to the lorry drivers’ employment in terms of social security and invested the Court of Justice of the European Union with the task of explaining if such employees should be considered as “part of the personnel” of the company with the formal position of employer or if, instead, they should be considered employees of the company at whose disposal they were at for at unlimited period of time.

The EU court hearing the case explained that signing of a job contract can be an indication of the existence of an employment relationship between the employee and company, but that alone may not be enough; it is also necessary to take into account the way in which the contract obligations are actually performed.

Therefore, regardless of the literal contents of the contract, the real employer is the entity whose authority is applicable to the worker, and who must bear the corresponding wages cost and who possesses the actual power for dismissal. The Court also stated that the objective of regulation 1408/71 is to ensure the free circulation of employees and self-employed workers within the European Union, but to comply with the particularities of national legislation concerning social security as well.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 May 2026

Legitimate dismissal for false attendance reporting and misuse of access system data (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…

17 Apr 2026

Criminal penalties are being introduced for those who fail to protect remote workers (The Platform, 17 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Martina De Angeli)

The provision amends Legislative Decree 81/2008 by introducing a new Article 3, paragraph 7-bis, which makes compliance with safety obligations conditional upon the delivery—at least annually—of a written…