Criminal penalties are being introduced for those who fail to protect remote workers (The Platform, 17 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Martina De Angeli)
The provision amends Legislative Decree 81/2008 by introducing a new Article 3, paragraph 7-bis, which makes compliance with safety obligations conditional upon the delivery—at least annually—of a written notice to employees working remotely (more commonly known as smart working) and to the Workers’ Safety Representative (RLS). This document must be comprehensive and consistent with the Risk Assessment Document (DVR) and must include information on general risks, specific risks, technostress, the use of display screen equipment, and risks related to commuting.
An obligation that already existed, but without teeth.
Taking stock of the practical impact of this change is Martina De Angeli, senior associate and practice leader at De Luca & Partners. “This obligation to provide the notice at least annually was already предусмотрed by Law 81 of 2017, which regulates agile (remote) work.”
In practice, the issue was that, without explicit consequences, many companies tended to push this requirement to the bottom of their priority list. “Today there has been a bit of resonance,” De Angeli observes, “because in practice it was an obligation that always remained a low priority compared to signing agreements and notifying the authorities.” The firm has always done its best to raise awareness among companies about this obligation and therefore believes its clients are compliant. But the message for those who have not yet adapted is clear.
Continue reading the full version published on The Platform
The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), established by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the main income support measure for employees who have involuntarily…
In recent years, artificial intelligence has evolved from an experimental technology into a tool that is increasingly integrated into the day-to-day activities of HR functions. Among other things,…
At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…
The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…
Headnote In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…
The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…