Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: Dismissal, Licenziamento


31 Mar 2022

Waiver of right to appeal against dismissal: right available

With its ruling no. 1887 of 21 January 2022, the Court of Cassation stated that the employee might freely dispose of the right to challenge the employment relationship termination by waiving or settling.

Facts of the case

The facts of the case originate from the decision of the relevant local court, which was upheld on appeal, declaring inadmissible the employee’s request to verify the nullity of the term applied to the employment contracts assuming that a settlement had been reached between the parties.

The employee appealed to the Court of Cassation against the Court’s ruling, arguing that the settlement agreement signed was null and void because of the absence of the res litigiosa and the settlement concerned rights that were not available to the parties.

The Supreme Court of Cassation’s ruling

The Court of Cassation upheld the Court’s decision, stating that for the res litigiosa (a necessary element for the settlement validity) to exist, it is unnecessary that the parties’ arguments took the form of a claim and that the existence of a potential disagreement was sufficient, even if needed to be precisely defined as a dispute.

The Court of Cassation stated that the right to challenge an employment relationship termination and the worker’s interest in its continuation falls within the worker’s free choice.

According to the Court of Cassation, settlements on this issue are outside the scope of Art. 2113 of the Italian Civil Code, where only acts waiving the employee rights arising from mandatory legal or collective agreements provisions were considered invalid and challengeable.

On this basis, the Supreme Court dismissed the employee’s appeal. It deemed the inter partes conciliation valid assuming the Law recognised the worker’s right to definitively dispose of their job by negotiation and based on Art.  2118 of the Italian Civil Code.

Other related insights:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

20 May 2026

Webinar “May 1st Decree: Key Updates and what’s New” –  HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…

12 May 2026

Legitimate dismissal for false attendance reporting and misuse of access system data (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…