Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: appalti


22 Feb 2023

Contractual joint and several liability: contribution recovery is not subject to the two-year limitation period (Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto of Il Sole 24 Ore, 22 February 2023 – Vittorio De Luca, Stefania Raviele)

The order under comment confirms the Supreme Court case law which differentiates the deadlines
applicable to the actions carried out by employees under procurement contract and those governing
contribution recovery by INPS.

In its order no.  38151 of 30 December 2022 the Court of Cassation, ruled on procurement contract joint and several liability, confirming its policy according to which the two-year limitation period  under Art. 29, paragraph 2, Legislative Decree 276/2003 would not apply to the obligation to pay contributions.

Based on the legislative provision’s wording, employing parties are jointly and severally liable with contractors for wages, severance indemnity payments, social security contributions and insurance premiums, with the sole exception of civil penalties. Under the legal provision, the joint and several liability lasts for two years from contract termination.

The above is an actual forfeiture term.

During 2011 and 2012, the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies and INPS explained the scope of this provision, adopting a literal interpretation and stated that the two-year limitation period applies to contribution recovery at the expense of the social security institution.

According to those institutions, the two-year limitation period should have applied to INPS’s creditor claims against the jointly and severally liable party. Once the two-year period had expired, the Institution could claim its credit only against the principal debtor within the five-year limitation period.

Continue reading the full version published on Norme e Tributi Plus Diritto of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…