Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: Covid19, rapporto di lavoro


7 May 2020

Coronavirus emergency and suspension of remuneration in case of force majeure (Guida al Lavoro de Il Sole 24 Ore, 7 May 2020 – Vittorio De Luca e Antonella Iacobellis)

Considerations at the time of COVID-19: does the current emergency integrate the hypothesis of force majeure for the suspension of remuneration? Does the current COVID-19 spread pandemic situation integrate the hypothesis of force majeure?

In the light of the above questions, it has been deemed appropriate to make some brief reflections on the impact that this event may have on employment relations, evaluating whether the particular contingency may or may not exonerate the operator unable to fulfil the contract – in this case, the employer who suspends the payment of the salary – to invoke force majeure.

The onerous and synallagmatic nature of the employment relationship

As is well known, in Article 2094 of the Italian Civil Code the legislator describes an employee as “a person who is obliged by remuneration to work in the company, performing his or her intellectual or manual work under the direction and dependence of the entrepreneur”.

For the purposes of our interest, the analysis of the above rule shows that in the context of an employment relationship:

– the worker or employee is obliged to carry out a specific work activity, and

– the employer is obliged to pay a salary.

– We add that the employment relationship is, among other things, characterized by:

– the payment of wages to the worker as one of its essential elements;

– synallagmatic performance, in the sense of performance in return for remuneration.

The relationship between employer and employee can also be read from the point of view of debt and credit position.

From this point of view, the employee is bound to an obligation to do, i.e. the locatio operarum, traditionally understood as an obligation of means (one’s own working energies), the employer is bound to pay him/her the salary.

Read the full version of the article in Italian here.

Source: Guida al lavoro – Il Sole 24 ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…