Categories: Insights, Practice

Tag: Autorità Garante, Data Breach, EDPB


25 Feb 2021

Data Breach: The European Data Protection Authority Guidelines for handling data breaches.

The Italian Data Protection Authority, with the newsletter 472 of 25 January 2021, announced that on 14 January, the EDPB (“European Data Protection Board”) adopted new Guidelines (“Guidelines 01/2021 on Examples regarding Data Breach Notification”, the “Guidelines”) aimed at supporting companies and public administration in correctly addressing data breaches and defining risk management processes.

The document adds to the previous guidelines of Working Party 29 (“Guidelines on Personal data breach notification under Regulation 2016/679”) which, include a technical-theoretical analysis of what is prescribed by Regulation (EU) 2016/697 (the “Regulation”) about personal data breaches (or “Data Breach”).

Considering information security principles, recalling “Opinion 3/2014” and “Guidelines WP 250”, EDPB provides a classification of the type of breaches, namely:

  • “confidentiality breaches” – occur when there is an unauthorised disclosure of or access to personal data;
  • “integrity breaches” – occur when there is an unauthorised or accidental alteration of personal data;
  • “availability breaches” – occur when there is an accidental or loss of access to or destruction of personal data.

Aiming to provide useful guidance to data controllers and data processors on how to handle a personal data breach correctly, the Guidelines illustrate what to avoid (e.g. failure to encrypt data). They also contain numerous practical case studies involving hospitals, banks, businesses and online service companies of various kinds in different European countries.

These case studies describe the preventive measures that can be taken and suggest how to carry out a breach risk assessment, the potential measures that can be taken to reduce the risks and legal obligations that must be met.

EDPB launched a European public consultation on the document that will end on 2 March 2021.

Others insights related:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…