Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: cassa integrazione guadagni in deroga


23 May 2020

Derogated social shock absorbers for multi-localized companies: a real obstacle course (Il Sole 24 Ore, 23 May 2020 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandra Zilla)

The fragmented regulatory framework is creating long delays and difficulties for multi-localized companies in accessing the derogated social shock absorbers (in Italian “Cassa integrazione Guadagni in deroga”, CIGD). The regulatory framework imposes on these companies conditions that are incomprehensibly more restrictive and procedures more complex for access to social shock absorbers than, for example, for companies of the industrial sector. It is sufficient to note that for these latter companies it is not mandatory to reach the union agreement, unlike what is required for multi-located companies.

Many rules, often inconsistent with each other, have been issued in recent weeks to regulate the modalities of access to CIGD for multi-localized companies. However, the “Rilancio decree” has not simplified the CIGD procedures for these companies, but has only introduced the possibility for employers to advance the payment of the CIGD, and then recover such payment from the National Institute of Social Security subsequently.

Vittorio De Luca and Alessandra Zilla talk about it for Il Sole 24 Ore on Saturday 23rd May, on the special dedicated to the work rules of the Recovery Decree.

Download on the Il Sole 24 ore Website the contribution of the firm on Derogated social shock absorbers for multi-localized companies.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…