Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: contratti a termine, fixed-term contracts


7 Jun 2021

Exceptions to the motivation obligation in fixed-term contracts and the reason behind the Inspectorate’s note of 12 May 2021 (Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto – Il Sole 24 Ore, 7 June 2021 – Alberto De Luca, Stefania Raviele)

Since the beginning of the pandemic, the strict restrictions on the possibility of concluding fixed-term contracts have been suspended for the obvious purpose of favouring employment (albeit fixed-term), which was severely damaged by the economic fallout of the epidemic. Indeed, as early as with the law converting Decree Law no. 18/2020 (so-called  Cura Italia), the possibility of concluding fixed-term contracts had been introduced as an exception: (i) to the prohibition of concluding fixed-term contracts or temporary work contracts in production units where social safety nets were also being used (Art. 20, par. 1, letter C) and Art. 32, par. 1, letter c), Legislative Decree. no. 81/2015); (ii) to the obligation to have a period of unemployment elapse between a fixed-term contract and its renewal with the same employer (so-called stop&go, Art. 21, par. 2 of Legislative Decree 81/2015); and (iii). Further exceptions to the ordinary rules on fixed-term contracts were then introduced with the so-called Rilancio Decree whose Art. 93 introduced an exception to the motivation obligation [translator’s note: the obligation whereby a fixed-term contract must be justified] in the case of the renewal or extension of fixed-term contracts in force on 23 February 2020, by 30 August 2020. Since it was not clear, from reading the rule, whether this right of extension or renewal without motivation was possible only for contracts expiring by 30 August, the National Labour Inspectorate intervened with note no. 160 of 3 June 2020, confirming that the double condition for the enforcement of this option necessarily required the existence of the fixed-term contract on 23 February and the expiry of its term by 30 August 2020, so that contracts existing on 30 August but not expiring by that date could not be renewed or extended. The August Decree further reworded the exception to the motivation obligation, establishing the possibility of extending or renewing fixed-term contracts without motivation for “no more than twelve months and once only”, though within the limit of “a maximum total duration of twenty-four months”, no longer requiring that the renewed fixed-term contract had already been in place on 23 February, and extending the possibility of an extension or renewal by 31 December 2020 also to contracts expiring after that date. The scope for the application of extensions and renewals without motivation was subsequently extended until 31 March and, later on, until 31 December 2021 (Art. 17 of the Sostegni Decree. Therefore, according to current law, fixed-term contracts may be extended and/or renewed until 31 December 2021, without motivation, once only and for a period of 12 months provided that employment does not last longer than 24 months. However, the sequence of extensions and renewals (of the legislation derogating from the motivation obligation) did not discuss or even only mention the fundamental clarification contained in the very first emergency legislation (Art. 19bis Cura Italia Decree) which clarified that fixed-term contracts could be extended and/or renewed even where social safety nets were in place.
 To the relief of the operators in the sector, the National Labour Inspectorate intervened once again on this point in note no. 762 of 12 May 2021 specifying that Art. 19bis is still to be regarded as in force since it is a rule used for the authentic interpretation of Arts. 19 to 22 of Decree Law 18/2020 which introduced the emergency social safety nets, never repealed and extended from time to time.

Continue reading the full version published in Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…