Categories: Insights, Publications


31 Oct 2019

Failure to Adopt the Model: accidents at work and the authority’s responsibility (Newsletter Norme & Tributi n. 136– Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica – Vittorio De Luca, Elena Cannone)

The Court of Cassation, Fourth Criminal Section, with sentence 35934 of last 09 August, declared a company responsible for the crime of serious injury with violation of safety rules at work. This is because it had not adopted an Organisational Model for health and safety at work suited to prevent the commission of such an offence. In this case, a worker (who was not legally employed), lost their balance while dismantling a beam from the stage where a musical event had been held, falling from a height of about two meters. The fall caused temporary and permanent injuries to the worker. The Court of Cassation, in confirming its decision on the matter, and in addition to declaring the legal representative of the company guilty of the crime of negligent injury, imposed a fine of 100 instalments for a total amount of €30,000 and banned the company from conducting business for a period of one month, resulting in further damage to both assets and image. In consideration of the above, it is advisable for each authority to adopt and implement an Organisational Model suited to prevent culpable serious injuries caused by the violation of accident-prevention measures. This is in order to avoid the automatic triggering of liability at the time of the offence with costly legal consequences.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…