Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: distacco


30 Sep 2020

Fictitious secondment (“posting”), the contributory and social security saving is fraud (Guida al Lavoro de Il Sole 24 Ore, 25 September 2020 – Vittorio De Luca and Antonella Iacobellis)

The Court of Cassation has ruled on the matter of the fictitious secondment (“posting”) of employees. Sanctions shall be imposed on any undertaking seconding (“posting”) its own employees by way of fictitious secondment (“posting”). The sanctions provided for under the Biagi Law as to a lawful and correct application of the secondment (“posting”) institution must not be confused with those under the Criminal Code pertaining to the crime of fraud against the State. In the case at issue, the profit of the fraud crime consists in the contributory and social security saving reached by the seconding (“posting”) employer through the fictitious secondment (“posting”).

With judgment No. 23291 of 15 July 2020, the Second Criminal Division of the Court of Cassation imposed sanctions on a seconding (“posting”) undertaking for the fictitious secondment (“posting”) of employees, also laying stress on the fact that the sanctions provided for under the Biagi Law related to a lawful and correct application of the secondment (“posting”) institution must not be confused with those under the Criminal Code pertaining to the crime of fraud against the State.

Continue here to read the full version of the article (in Italian).

Source: Guida al lavoro de Il Sole 24 ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…