Categories: Insights, Publications


26 Apr 2018

GDPR: security measures to support data protection (Newsletter Norme & Tributi n. 123 – Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica – Vittorio De Luca, Luciano Vella)

The European Regulation on the protection natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data has abolished the minimum security measures that were at the basis of the “privacy policy” system and listed in Annex B of Legislative Decree No. 196/03. Pursuant to Article 32 of the Regulation, in fact, the Data Controller and Processor – taking into account the state of the art, the costs of implementation and the nature, scope, context and purposes of processing – must implement suitable measures to “guarantee a level of security appropriate to the risk”. This is because the Data Controller and Processor must be able to guarantee and demonstrate that they have done everything possible to limit the occurrence of a risk, in compliance with the principle of “accountability” which leaves them full freedom to identify the appropriate technical and organisational measures. To this end, both the Data Controller and the Data Processor cannot do without a gap analysis and a risk assessment, that is a preliminary assessment of the various risks. Should there be a risk of negative impact on the rights and fundamental freedoms of the data subject, this risk must be analysed through a specific evaluation process (e.g. impact assessment). In this sense, on the basis of the foregoing, the protocols relating to the Special Part of Model 231 on IT crimes must be kept updated, also in order to be able to demonstrate the status of compliance with the European data protection regulation.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…