Categories: Insights, Case Law


28 Nov 2017

An employer can monitor its employee’s corporate email account

The Court of Cassation, with judgement 26682/2017, ruled as lawful the disciplinary dismissal ordered to an employee who accused of ineptitude and incompetence employees and top management of the company using offending words in several messages sent through his corporate email account. In the specific case, the employee, in bringing to Court the employer’s dismissal, claimed among others failure to adopt the corporate regulations on the use of IT systems. In this respect, the Supreme Court pointed out that the failing relationship of trust was not due to the use of the corporate email account for purposes other than for work, but due to the offensive content of the emails regarding employees and top management of the Company. Moreover, the Court highlighted that the monitoring performed by the employer on the corporate email account of the employee, despite the exceptions of the latter, had to be deemed lawful, since it took place due to an anomaly notified by the system administrator and carried out ex post because of reasonable doubt regarding the existence of damaging conducts outside the performance of the work obligations (that is, damaging the image of the company and the dignity of other employees). Essentially, an employer can perform focused inspections to verify the correct use of the work tools, including corporate PCs, as long as, in order to maintain a balance of interests, this is done in respect of the freedom and dignity of the employee and the principles of fairness, pertinence and non-excess dictated by the privacy regulation.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…