Categories: Insights, Case Law


28 Nov 2017

An employer can monitor its employee’s corporate email account

The Court of Cassation, with judgement 26682/2017, ruled as lawful the disciplinary dismissal ordered to an employee who accused of ineptitude and incompetence employees and top management of the company using offending words in several messages sent through his corporate email account. In the specific case, the employee, in bringing to Court the employer’s dismissal, claimed among others failure to adopt the corporate regulations on the use of IT systems. In this respect, the Supreme Court pointed out that the failing relationship of trust was not due to the use of the corporate email account for purposes other than for work, but due to the offensive content of the emails regarding employees and top management of the Company. Moreover, the Court highlighted that the monitoring performed by the employer on the corporate email account of the employee, despite the exceptions of the latter, had to be deemed lawful, since it took place due to an anomaly notified by the system administrator and carried out ex post because of reasonable doubt regarding the existence of damaging conducts outside the performance of the work obligations (that is, damaging the image of the company and the dignity of other employees). Essentially, an employer can perform focused inspections to verify the correct use of the work tools, including corporate PCs, as long as, in order to maintain a balance of interests, this is done in respect of the freedom and dignity of the employee and the principles of fairness, pertinence and non-excess dictated by the privacy regulation.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…