Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: Gender Gap, Pay Transparency, trasparenza salariale


8 Jul 2026

Pay transparency: one month after its entry into force, two approaches are emerging in the market (The Platform, 8 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Claudia Cerbone e Martina De Angeli)

Since 7 June, EU rules aimed at strengthening the principle of equal pay between men and women for the same work or for work of equal value have been applicable.

The rules explained step by step, along with the debate they have sparked. Pending the first case law developments, one point appears clear: pay transparency cannot be addressed as a mere documentation requirement, but will require companies to undertake a broader reflection on the consistency, traceability and objectivity of their job classification and pay determination systems.

Pay transparency: Legislative Decree No. 96/2026 enters into force, introducing new obligations for companies

With Legislative Decree No. 96 of 7 May 2026, published in the Official Gazette No. 125 of 1 June 2026 and effective from 7 June 2026, the Italian legislator implemented Directive (EU) 2023/970, introducing a comprehensive set of rules aimed at strengthening the principle of equal pay between men and women for the same work or for work of equal value.

The reform does not merely introduce new formal requirements but has a broader impact on the organisation of companies’ pay policies: on the one hand, it imposes greater transparency obligations on employers; on the other, it provides employees with more effective information and protection tools, with the aim of addressing the gender pay gap and promoting genuine pay equity.

Key obligations for employers

1. Transparency obligations in recruitment procedures

The first area affected concerns access to employment: candidates must be informed of the initial salary or the relevant pay range before being hired, enabling a more informed and transparent negotiation process.

Alongside this, employers will be prohibited from requesting information about a candidate’s previous remuneration, preventing past employment history from automatically influencing the determination of the new salary. The rationale is clear: to avoid existing inequalities from previous work experiences being carried forward and reinforced throughout an individual’s career.

Adoption of objective and gender-neutral pay criteria

Transparency, however, does not only concern the recruitment stage. The new legislation requires companies’ pay systems to be based on objective, transparent and gender-neutral criteria, making the process of determining remuneration verifiable. Consistently with this approach, the criteria used to determine pay, career progression and advancement opportunities must be made accessible to employees, allowing effective scrutiny of the neutrality of company decisions.

Continue reading the full version published on The Platform

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…