Categories: Insights, Case Law


30 Oct 2017

Ancillary criteria for the qualification of a labour relationship as employment

The Court of Cassation, with judgement No. 23846 filed on 11 October 2017, intervened on the qualification of a self-employment relationship as employment. In the specific case, the Court of Cassation stated that subjugation to managerial and disciplinary power cannot be an exclusive criterion to determine whether employment is or is not occurring. This is because, based on the type of task assigned to the worker and the context in which the service is carried out, other characteristics pertaining to the relationship must also be assessed. In ruling, the Court of Cassation followed a consolidated trend on the basis of which, if it is not possible to use as the sole criterion the subjugation of the employee to the managerial, organisational and disciplinary power [of the employer], it is possible to make use of distinctive ancillary criteria such as: (i) continuity and duration of the relationship; (ii) methods of remuneration payment; (iii) work time regulations; (iv) existence of a self-organization power of the employee. And in this case, it was clear that, contrary to the adopted nomen iuris, (a) the work was carried out on company premises, according to predetermined work schedules and subdivided into shifts established by the employer; (b) the services were performed according to a timetable which the workers, once accepted the shift, had to respect; (c) in the event of unavailability, the workers were required to give prior notice to the employer; (d) they had no personal equipment and did not incur any financial risk, since their remuneration was guaranteed; (e) the worker who was unable to go to work had to inform in advance. Specifically, in this context, the Court stated that the absence of disciplinary power could not per se lead to the denial of an employment relationship, with particular reference to standardised services, subjected to continuous checks and direct corrective measures which leave little room for its implementation.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…