Categories: Insights, Case Law


29 Jan 2017

Article 18 of the Workers’ Statute, ancillary work and contracts: the decision of the Constitutional Court

On 11 January the Constitutional Court declared its opinion on the admissibility of the three referendums proposed by CGIL, related to (i) Article 18 of the Workers’ Statute and the reintegration into the workplace of a worker in the event of unlawful dismissal, (ii) the cancellation of vouchers and iii) the re-establishment, in the matter of tender contracts, of joint and several liability between customer and contractor. In particular, the Constitutional Court approved the last two referendums, which will be put to the vote between next April 16 and June 11, while declaring, however, its non-acceptance of the matter regarding Article 18 of Law 300/70. The final rejection by the Constitutional Court occurred with seven votes against and six votes in favour of the request. The Court, which will post the reasons of the above judgments by 10 February 2017, would seem to have rejected the matter regarding Article 18 because, as it was submitted, it would have become a manipulative referendum, unsuitable to reintroduce the old formulation of Article 18, but, rather, suitable to provide the work environment with an entirely new provision, turning the referendum into a proactive question, which, as such, would be completely inadmissible.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…