Categories: Insights, Case Law


26 Jun 2017

Company know-how prevails over the employee’s right of defence

The Court of Cassation, with judgement No. 12804 dated 22 May 2017, stated that a disciplinary measure can be applied to any employee who photocopies material representing company know-how, even if such activity is carried out to protect the employee’s right in a legal proceeding. In the specific case, the employee, first disciplined and then dismissed, appealed to the Court of Cassation stating that (i) the photocopying of the company material was necessary for his defence since he had been demoted for a long time (ii) the documentation was not confidential, and, in any case (iii) the protection of rights shall prevail over the duty of confidentiality. According to the Court of Cassation, this reason cannot be deemed well founded since, “even from the testimony performed”, it appeared that the photocopying did not concern “a mere proprietary material of the company”, but “instructions that contained specific information regarding the type of materials, procedures and the tools used (…) thus actual company know-how whose confidentiality is strengthened by the need not to divulge to third parties (including those who may be competitors) knowledge that has a production importance“. Therefore, according to the Court, what is emphasized is not “a generic duty not to disclose corporate documents, but a specific obligation to keep confidential documents that concern important and significant aspects of the employer’s production organization.” Documents that, among other things, the employee, according to the Court, could have requested to obtain through the court under Article. 210 of the code of civil procedures.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…