Categories: Insights, Case Law


26 Jun 2017

Company know-how prevails over the employee’s right of defence

The Court of Cassation, with judgement No. 12804 dated 22 May 2017, stated that a disciplinary measure can be applied to any employee who photocopies material representing company know-how, even if such activity is carried out to protect the employee’s right in a legal proceeding. In the specific case, the employee, first disciplined and then dismissed, appealed to the Court of Cassation stating that (i) the photocopying of the company material was necessary for his defence since he had been demoted for a long time (ii) the documentation was not confidential, and, in any case (iii) the protection of rights shall prevail over the duty of confidentiality. According to the Court of Cassation, this reason cannot be deemed well founded since, “even from the testimony performed”, it appeared that the photocopying did not concern “a mere proprietary material of the company”, but “instructions that contained specific information regarding the type of materials, procedures and the tools used (…) thus actual company know-how whose confidentiality is strengthened by the need not to divulge to third parties (including those who may be competitors) knowledge that has a production importance“. Therefore, according to the Court, what is emphasized is not “a generic duty not to disclose corporate documents, but a specific obligation to keep confidential documents that concern important and significant aspects of the employer’s production organization.” Documents that, among other things, the employee, according to the Court, could have requested to obtain through the court under Article. 210 of the code of civil procedures.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…