Categories: Insights, Case Law


25 Jul 2016

Court of Appeal in Milan: messages in a mailing list protected like private correspondence

The Court of Appeal in Milan, in its ruling No. 439/2016, confirmed the principle that e-mail messages exchanged among employees as part of a mailing list, constitute private correspondence and therefore fall into the category of protected communications of a personal nature. According to the Court, the personality of the communication “lies in the predetermination of the recipients, which the sender wishes to send their e-mail message to – those persons and not others”. The case in question concerns an action brought by an airline pilot sacked for misconduct for instigating colleagues to engage in trade-union activity contrary to the employer’s obligations. In support of the grounds for dismissal, the employers produced the emails exchanged between the person concerned and his colleagues, highlighting the damage caused by these actions. Nevertheless, the territorial Court, sticking to the position already taken in the past by the Italian Data Protection Authority stated that emails that circulate within mailing lists, just like paper-based correspondence, must be treated in the same way as correspondence that is closed and inviolable by third parties (Editor’s Note: in this case, the employer)” and, thus, falling under the protection of Article 15 of the Italian Constitution. In this way, the judges deemed the grounds given for the dismissal as unfounded, because it lacked any evidence that could legitimise the employer’s actions.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…