Categories: Insights


31 Aug 2016

Court of Cassation: information due to the employer during an employee’s absence for sickness

With sentence no. 15226 dated 22 July 2016, the Court of Cassation rejected the petition of a female employee seeking to overturn the sentence of the court of Appeals which upheld her dismissal for disciplinary reasons i.e. absenteeism because of her failure to submit a medical certificate. In the account of the employee, she went to her GP to obtain an extension to the medical certificate, which had expired, but the GP was absent. His replacement sent the certificate to the INPS website. However, the judges of the lower courts ruled that (i) the employee had not promptly notified the employer of her absence, as specified in the national employment agreement for the sector, and (ii) the relevant certificate never reached the Institute [INPS] nor was any evidence provided that the replacement GP had attempted to send it. According to the Court, the concept of unjustified absence, cited in the letter of dismissal, does not refer only to «the lack of justification in an absolute sense» but also to «failure to notify the employer of the existence of the illness or its extension». Asking the GP for a certificate does not meet the requirement for diligence, since the employee is obliged to promptly to notify his/her absence to the employer and to verify the proper outcome of the online procedure and transmission of the sickness certificate. The employee, in fact, may only not send the hard copy form of the certificate, this obligation having been replaced by e-mail transmission by the GP to the Institute.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…