Categories: Insights, Case Law


26 May 2016

Court of Cassation: the insults to the boss justify the dismissal without notice

By way of judgment No. 9635 lodged on 11 May 2016, the Court of Cassation has stated that in no way can the concept of insubordination be limited to the refusal to abide by the instructions given by the employer, but it extends to any conduct capable of causing damage to the company’s organisation. Well then, according to the Supreme Court, an insult aimed at one’s boss not only infringes the needs for protection of the individual under article 2 of the Constitution, but may also “be in itself liable to causing damage do the company’s organisation, since the latter’s efficiency lies (…) on the authoritativeness of his/her own executives and senior managers, and such authoritativeness is certainly damaged when the worker, with offensive tones, ascribes clearly dishonourable qualities to them”. The above regardless of the fact that the conduct at issue is typified by the National Collective Bargaining Agreement as a case of just cause or not, since the concept of ‘just cause’ is a legal concept and in no way can the judge deem to be bound by the provisions under the National Collective Bargaining Agreement. Indeed, in the Court’s opinion, the judge may recognise the existence of just cause in a serious breach or conduct of the worker against the ethical rules and against the rules of common civilised living, should it be detrimental to the relationship of trust between the parties.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…