Categories: Insights, Case Law


27 Oct 2015

Court of Rome 30 September 2015: the “new” article 2013 of the Civil Code and its field of application

With the sentence filed last 30 September, the Court of Rome ruled for the first time on the reform of job duties introduced with the Legislative Decree no. 81/2015 implementing the Jobs Act, providing its interpretation on the matter. According to the Court job downgrading constitutes a type of “permanent illegality”, which is implemented and renewed every day that the worker is required to perform duties inferior to the ones he has the right to perform, and, thus the assessment of lawfulness or lack of the same in terms of the employer’s conduct should be made in reference to the current legislation and contractual provision day by day. This means that, if this legislation changes, authorizing a conduct which not allowed before, the illegality ceases for periods after the change in legislation. The conclusions reached by the Court of Rome in this first interpretation seem to reflect the findings of the literature issued immediately after the decree became effective.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…