Categories: Insights, Case Law


26 Feb 2017

Dismissal for just cause of an employee consuming corporate goods is lawful independently of the marginal damage suffered by the employer.

The Court of Bologna with judgement no. 149 dated 10 February 2017, declared lawful the dismissal for just cause ordered for an employee who consumed company goods (food and beverages) at the workplace. During the summary case hearing, the Judge of the court where the employee filed the appeal under article 1, paragraph 48, of Law 92/2012, deemed the dismissal unlawful and ordered the employer to pay an indemnity equal to 12 months of salary based on the last remuneration. The Judge of the opposing party, amending the order of the first Judge, with judgement under review, declared the dismissal lawful despite the marginal magnitude of the corporate damage caused, pointing out among other things the following: (i) witnesses reported that the employee was not new to conducts similar to those that led to the dismissal; (ii) the employee denied the alleged facts rather than admitting them; (iii) the position held by the employee (assistant in a department). However, from this judgement it emerges that in assessing the proportionality between the alleged fact and the measures taken, an important consideration is the effect on the employment relationship from a conduct capable of casting doubts on the honesty of any future fulfilment [of the employment role]. This is an indication of a certain behaviour of the worker with regards to the obligations undertaken regardless of the lack of damage or the marginal damage that the conduct may cause.

 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…