Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: Licenziamento per giustificato motivo oggettivo


8 Jan 2018

Dismissal justified by objective reasons: redistribution of tasks and increase in profits

The Court of Cassation, with its judgement No. 29238 dated 6 December 2017, ruled once again on the legitimacy of dismissal due to removal of the job position occurred as a result of a reorganisation aimed at increasing the efficiency and profitability of the company. First of all, the Court of Cassation upheld in its entirety the judgement issued by the court of appeals contested by the dismissed worker, giving continuity to its policy according to which a justified objective reason can occur even just with the different distribution of certain tasks among the staff in service, if implemented “with the purpose of a more efficient company management”. In other words, according to the Court, certain tasks can be redistributed among more than one worker, with “the final result of showing the redundancy of the job position of that employee assigned exclusively to that position“. Moreover, in the Court opinion, dismissal for justified objective reasons must not necessarily be due to a company crisis. Indeed, “in order to legitimise individual dismissal for justified objective reasons, the negative economic trend of the company does not constitute a factual requirement that the employer must necessarily prove, it being sufficient that the reasons concerning the productive activity and organization of work, including those aimed at a better management efficiency or an increase in profitability, determine a real change in the organizational structure through the removal of a given job position”.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…